And another, this time from Jeremy Crampton, speaking to a specific form of contemporary power(s): “neoliberalism”.
Is the map a stable cultural object?
Gillian Rose (OU) has a new paper at Progress in Human Geography (PiHG). The key quote from her abstract is:
This paper argues that [cultural geography] must begin to map the complexities of digitally-mediated cultural production, circulation and interpretation. It will argue that, to do this, it is necessary to move away from the attentive gaze on stable cultural objects as formulated by some of the new cultural geography, and instead focus on mapping the dynamics of the production, circulation and modification of meaning at digital interfaces and across frictional networks.
This raises the question of what is a “stable cultural object”? For example, is a map a stable cultural object, or more precisely do studies of “the map” treat it as such? If Rose is correct, then she is pointing to a different understanding of the map, one which is not a…
View original post 657 more words